TeamViewer alternative: Auffi compared head-to-head

Auffi is a free, open-source (AGPL-3.0) and GDPR-compliant alternative to TeamViewer for ad-hoc screen sharing and remote support. The person helping just opens auffi.app in a browser and types in a 9-digit code — no installation, no account. The servers are in Germany, and every stream is end-to-end encrypted with DTLS-SRTP. TeamViewer is more comprehensive and more mature, but proprietary and paid for commercial use.

Comparison table

FeatureAuffiTeamViewer
PriceFree (private & commercial)Free for private use only; commercial is paid
License / open sourceAGPL-3.0, open source & auditableProprietary, closed source
Server locationGermany (IONOS Frankfurt)Cloud infrastructure (German company)
Self-hostableYes (Docker Compose)No
Installation (person helping)None — browser onlyApp/QuickSupport needed
Account needed (ad-hoc)NoNo (QuickSupport)
EncryptionEnd-to-end, DTLS-SRTP (WebRTC)End-to-end, AES-256
Trackers / telemetryNone; cookieless opt-in statsTelemetry present
Unattended accessYes (paired devices)Yes, very mature
Platforms (sharer)Windows, Linux (macOS coming)Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android
Feature scopeFocus: screen + remote control + fileVery broad (meetings, mobile, asset mgmt)

As of: May 2026

When Auffi is the better choice

When TeamViewer (still) has the edge

Auffi at a glance

TeamViewer alternative in practice: three typical situations

Help over the phone. The classic case: someone is stuck and you want a quick look at their screen. The bottleneck is never the remote control — it is the minutes before it. Finding the download, dismissing the security warning, reading out the ID. If all you have to pass on is an address and nine digits, that part disappears.

Clubs and volunteering. Formally private, yet behaviourally hard to tell apart from business use: many different machines, often during the day. That is precisely the pattern TeamViewer's commercial-use detection keys on. You can appeal, but it takes time — and the session you were in has ended regardless.

Freelancers and small businesses. Here the licence is legitimately owed. The only question is whether the feature set matches the need: if you rely on device management, meetings and mobile apps, paying for them is fair. If you occasionally need to look at one screen, you are paying for features that never get used.

Auffi covers the third case without drawing a line between private and commercial use, and the first because nothing is installed on the helping side. For the breadth the second case needs, TeamViewer remains the wider tool — as the table above says plainly.

Switching in three steps

  1. Install the sharer on the machine to be shared — Windows or Linux, no registration.
  2. Generate a code and pass it to the person helping; it is valid for ten minutes.
  3. Confirm the request when it appears and pick a monitor.

None of this requires uninstalling TeamViewer. Running both side by side is the lowest-risk route: the familiar path stays available while you find out whether the new one holds up day to day.

Frequently asked questions

Is Auffi really free — even commercially?

Yes. Auffi is completely free and open source under AGPL-3.0, with no usage limit and no distinction between private and commercial use. TeamViewer is only free for private use; commercial use requires a license.

Is Auffi GDPR-compliant?

Yes. Servers in Germany, no IPs in plaintext, no trackers, no logging of content — and fully self-hostable thanks to the AGPL.

Do I need an account or an installation?

Not for ad-hoc help: the person helping just opens auffi.app and types in the code. Only the person sharing their own screen downloads the sharer; an account is only needed for permanent unattended access.

Can Auffi fully replace TeamViewer?

For ad-hoc screen-sharing help, yes. For mobile apps, meetings and enterprise device management TeamViewer remains broader — Auffi deliberately doesn't cover that.

Try it now

Share your screen — enter a code & connect · Download the sharer · TeamViewer commercial use blocked? · Remote support software compared